|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2016.02.28 08:40:08 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:We are excited to give you an update about Project Discovery, the real life Human Protein Research project in EVE Online. Project Discovery is waiting for you on the test server Singularity and we invite you to start testing this feature! Please read more about this great initiative in CCP Scarpia's dev blog Project Discovery needs You! and provide plenty of feedback. Real life scientist is more like it. I'm not so much in research without approval by government. However, that doesn't mean that I cannot do study with government approval, like study cases...
For instance, if I start research with approval and it is then waived, I would use it for legit case study.
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
168
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 01:53:24 -
[2] - Quote
I thought this was some missions users participated in and that was completed for the Injector project or something like that.
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
216
|
Posted - 2016.03.11 02:07:46 -
[3] - Quote
Iwata s wrote:Hi I have a few bug reports for project discovery. ...
thanks but I think bug reports go in another forum.
Please make sure to refer to it there.
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
223
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 00:00:45 -
[4] - Quote
Currently checking Zeitgeist penial gland and third-eye...
I tested the project (discovery) in some 4 or so of the first 10 tutorial tests and failed my first guess.
That of course dropped my accuracy ratio to a maximum of 50% maximum from start at test #2 (of the same tutorial test phase).
However, I am not sure if this means that I can still start at 100% accuracy at my first attempt, non-tutorial mode.
Also, it seems that I managed to close the client before completion of the first 10 tutorial tests. I also don't know if I can or have to finish the tutorial before risking to lose more accuracy or any at all. I know how to reduce the risk to zero and make it utterly worthless for a game, just how much is the risk worth. Also, what is the reward? Just accurately?
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
223
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 00:34:39 -
[5] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:It's not actually 'accuracy', but more like standing so it will build over time if you get things right. The rewards are certain items available from the Sisters of EVE LP store for Isk and the Analysis Kredits you get. So, it's possible to gain valuable standing (which I do know the value of, since I do have a few SOE standing already) can be gained from 'accuracy'.
The accuracy I refered to was the accuracy level obtained from submitting accurate and exact , correct analysis as to compared to an analysis report which is an error, and , inacurate.
It is literally like an accuracy ratio while typing on a keyboard, where, if you type faster, you will have many errors of inacurracy to fix. If you do type slower, your accuracy ratio may be higher, or 100%, but the end result may be slower than doing corrections.
This is not comparable with auto-correct which can fix errors at 90 words per minutes, or speech recognition, or voice recognition, which can interpret words at 60 words per minutes.
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
223
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 11:25:01 -
[6] - Quote
dJeven HouseBenyo wrote:Running into several in a row where there is some issue with sending the sample. It was working just fine while I wait for a skill then... new sample retry, sorry about losing your last submission.
Is Project Discovery overloading something somewhere along the internet connections yet again?
>Jeven A professional tech company suggested me that EVE Online had too many windowed functions in it's interface. For one thing, when they saw my shared screen, they could deduce how long it took me to close them one by one. Of course , there was the option to close all opened function windows at once, but I didn't use that. Using the [x] command was more simple.
Either way, yes, a simple interface is not only more appealing and more functional but it can also make or break a system.
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
293
|
Posted - 2016.04.15 02:03:47 -
[7] - Quote
No matter what accuracy they have, good or other, some pilot simply do not merit science, scientifically so. That is a good scientific explanation as to why their result may reflect a somewhat more biased opinion they prefer to promote.
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
|
|
|